The Last of Us – Not a Verdict

The Last of Us – Not a Verdict

The Last of Us may be a good game. Many have declared it the greatest game ever, others have commented on its setting, its superb voice acting and the brutality that drives the plot ever onwards. And, as is becoming a frequent occurrence these days, I have an opinion on it. This is not a review however, I have not finished the game and I quite possibly never will. But I want to at least throw my grain of salt onto the scales of greatness and have my voice counted, even though it’s clearly attempting to swim against the current…

I don’t like it.

A box of Daz would be lovely...
A box of Daz about now would be lovely…

Now that the shouting and screaming has died off, let me say this – I recognise why TLoU is popular. It easily has some of the best voice acting in any game ever, and it seems to flex and squeeze my little PS3, wringing every spare drop of visual fidelity from its ageing core to create scenes of devastation and suffering that are dense and vibrant. It’s a beautiful game, no doubt.

The plot is kind of fascinating too, the kind that taps into that morbid part of the mind that just has to see what’s under the scab – it’s brutal, unpleasantly harrowing and quite frankly not something that I would opt in for again. No spoilers, but the first hour made me more emotionally uncomfortable than a million R.R. Martin books ever could.

*Dramatic beard close-up*
*Dramatic beard close-up*

But of course it was all important. This isn’t the “No Russian” type grab for controversy I took it for at first, and after another few hours it had faded away as I discovered something that bothered me even more – the infamous “Clicker”. Easily the most interesting and most insanely frustrating enemy I have ever encountered, it can’t be killed stealthily without a shiv – a scarce item at the best of times – and kills you with one hit.

Ah, but it’s blind, they say. Yes, but it’s also the only creature that can hear you while you are sneaking.

Ah, but you can move even slower, then they can’t hear you, they say. Yes, but they throw around three Clickers at you at a time, and they are generally grouped with normal zombies that CAN see you, and scream when they do. Now shush.

Fighting humans was actually fun, they were pleasingly stupid. Just like in real life.
Fighting humans was actually fun, they were pleasingly stupid. Just like in real life.

Needless to say I died. Died again. Made some tea. Died a few more times. Then gave up and  started shooting everything that moved. Oh, Clickers are fairly resistant to bullets too? Right.

My difficulty with the game does not make it a bad game. Quite the contrary, I have a history of bouncing off games that are hailed as great; Deus Ex, Half Life, Quake 3… the list goes on. But it bothers me just how much of my dislike stems from things that are recognisably just bad design. Insta-death isn’t a problem in most games that implement it, often because developers understand how to make death a learning experience. But in TLoU, I die repeatedly not having a clue what I actually did wrong. The areas are often so dark it’s almost impossible to even hope to get through an area first time. Each encounter becomes a game of pinball, bouncing from one death to another trying to work out what the designer wants me to do to avoid getting chomped.

The checkpoint system is hilariously bad too, and plopping you back at the start of a heavily infested area after getting killed by the last damn bad guy is just torture. Later on you pick up some more effective weaponry but still, I was lucky to drag myself that far and I was unwilling to torture myself any further.

Mushroom people were much cuter in Super Mario Bros....
Mushroom people were much cuter in Super Mario Bros….

So I stopped playing, and moved on to other things. Better things, that didn’t make me feel inadequate, brutalised nor sick to my stomach. I will return someday, probably. I hate to leave a thing unfinished, especially as my friends and acquaintances all seem to think I’m insane for giving it up. But for now, I’ll stick with Dark Souls for my tough-but-enjoyable gaming sessions.

At least in that I can get a sword…

4 thoughts on “The Last of Us – Not a Verdict

  1. The first clicker you meet must have killed me fifteen or so times, ended up going guns ablaze against that one. They lock you in with it, which is a bit of a pain.

    Later clickers were a lot easier to deal with. Just distracted the groups with a thrown brick or bottle (you can stow one in your backpack, but the rooms are strewn with enough anyway) and sneak super slow past / shiv them if you *have* to deal with them. Still, I suppose the stealth can be a bit shonky (automatically invisible friendly NPCs is a bit of an immersion killer too).

    1. Oh yeah, I acknowledge my lack of skill is a factor, particularly with a PS3 pad. That doesn’t excuse blatantly dodgy design decisions…

      I’ve been told it levels out shortly after the part where I stopped playing, but the thought of going back gives me shivers.

  2. You’re not playing it right.

    You can’t take things head on most times. Seems like you’re trying to play it as a regular 3rd person run and gun type game. You can’t do that with TLOU.

    In fact, the worst parts of TLOU are exactly the bits where it goes into 3rd person run and gun shenanigans with waves of enemies.

    It’s a better game than that and needs to be played accordingly.

    1. I can assure you I am not playing it run-and-gun. But an hour trying (and failing) to sneak past a bunch of critters does fray one’s nerves to the point where shooting stuff seems therapeutic. And when that doesn’t work… *shrugs*.

      A game that forces you to play a certain way (and kills you if you don’t) is NOT a good game, in my opinion.

Leave a Reply to Steven Fulton Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.